Tianhong XU, Zheng WEI, Jing LI, Jiadai XU, Yang YANG, Wenjing WANG, Jingli ZHUANG, Zhimei WANG, Lili JI, Luya CHENG, Weiguang WANG, Zhixiang CHENG, Yang KE, Ling YUAN, Peng LIU. Prevalence and Clinical Implication of t(11;14) in Light-Chain Amyloidosis with or without Coexistent Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Proteasome Inhibitors[J]. Clinical Cancer Bulletin, 2022, 1(1): 3-10. DOI: 10.11910/j.issn.2791-3937.2022.20220001
Citation: Tianhong XU, Zheng WEI, Jing LI, Jiadai XU, Yang YANG, Wenjing WANG, Jingli ZHUANG, Zhimei WANG, Lili JI, Luya CHENG, Weiguang WANG, Zhixiang CHENG, Yang KE, Ling YUAN, Peng LIU. Prevalence and Clinical Implication of t(11;14) in Light-Chain Amyloidosis with or without Coexistent Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Proteasome Inhibitors[J]. Clinical Cancer Bulletin, 2022, 1(1): 3-10. DOI: 10.11910/j.issn.2791-3937.2022.20220001

Prevalence and Clinical Implication of t(11;14) in Light-Chain Amyloidosis with or without Coexistent Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Proteasome Inhibitors

  •   Background  Light-chain amyloidosis (AL) and multiple myeloma (MM) may coexist in some patients and, although they share some cytogenetic abnormalities, they usually present with different clinical phenotypes. Translocation (11;14) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality in AL, but the prevalence and clinical implication of t(11;14) in patients with AL, with or without coexistent MM, remains unclear.
      Methods  A total of 119 consecutive newly diagnosed AL patients with available fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data were retrospectively included and classified as primary AL alone (pAL-alone) or AL with coexistent MM (AL-MM). Clinical characteristics, FISH profiles, and hematologic and survival outcomes were analyzed.
      Results  There were 53 patients in the pAL-alone group and 66 in the AL-MM group. The prevalence of t(11;14) was significantly higher in the pAL-alone group than the AL-MM group (49.1% vs. 26.2%, P=0.012). A significantly higher proportion of the pAL-alone group achieved hematologic response compared with the AL-MM group (60.4% vs. 39.4%, P=0.023). Patients with AL-MM experienced significantly shorter hematologic event-free survival (hemEFS) than those with pAL-alone (median, 4.8 months vs. 44.3 months, P<0.001), as well as significantly shorter overall survival (OS; median, 15.2 months vs. not reached, P<0.001). When stratified by the presence or absence of coexistent MM and t(11;14), AL-MM patients with t(11;14) had the worst hemEFS (median, 3.8 months, P<0.001) and OS (median, 5.4 months, P=0.001).
      Conclusions  Patients with pAL-alone had a higher prevalence of t(11;14) than those with AL-MM. The AL-MM group had poorer outcomes, despite the availability of proteasome inhibitor treatment, with AL-MM patients with t(11;14) showing the worst outcomes. Better diagnostic and treatment approaches are warranted for this population.
  • loading

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return